Is Influencer Marketing just being outsourced to agencies?

Influencer Marketing, Influencer50, Nick Hayes, Influencer Marketing & Influencer Relations, The Buyerside Journey.comAs chair of the ‘Influencer Marketing & Influencer Relations’ LinkedIn Group I’ve just spent an hour or so this morning going through approving or declining those who have recently applied for membership of the group. Our group is quite specific – it’s a vendor-side group only, we’re not for contractors or those from agencies. And with that in mind I’m seeing an undoubted trend.

Our group was founded five years ago and we now have nearly 1000 members – all vendor-side. Throughout those five years we’ve had many contractors and agency staff apply – no surprises there. But the ratio of applicants is definitely moving towards those on the agency side.

In 2010 the ratio was 69% from vendors, 31% from agencies. In 2012 it was 57% vendors, 43% agencies. With nine months of 2014 gone this year it’s currently 44% vendors, 56% agencies. For the first time we’re having to decline significantly more applicants than we’re accepting. But that’s not the important fact.

I think we’re seeing evidence of our long-held belief that vendors have largely outsourced their interest in, and staffing of, influencer marketing. It’s just not being done in-house. Whether it’s the PR agency, the ad agency or the social outreach agency, influencer marketing activity is being outsourced. That would certainly explain why there’s no universally accepted understanding of what it means – because the ad agency shapes it to mean one thing and the PR agency twists it to mean another. More often than not these agencies then pass responsibility for it either to another division in their own firm or outsource it further along the line to their SEO partner, blogger relations team or whoever.

Influencer Marketing has been jumped on by every type of marketing services firm – because of the revenue opportunity they see in any new trend. And in doing so in-house marketing depts. have been left blinded as to what initially drew them to Influencer Marketing – the chance to directly reach individuals who actually make a difference to their sales.

Of course it could be simply that there are more agency staff and contractors than in-house staff these days, or that they’re just more disposed to joining LinkedIn groups than in-house staff. But I think the whole current direction of influencer marketing is being driven by the agency agenda – an agenda to deliver impressive sounding numbers back to their in-house bosses.

But if those bosses really thought about it, they’d want something very different from influencer marketing than they’re getting. They’d want it to be helping them with their sales.

Reblog: The growth of social business, from Andrew Grill

Screen Shot 2014-08-11 at 10.30.46 AMI dont always agree with Andrew Grill, now of IBM, but in this post he talks a lot of sense. The future of ‘social’ is in the ‘business’ not the ‘media’. A message we’ve been saying for years.

https://www.linkedin.com/today/post/article/20140811104622-283662-why-i-m-staking-my-career-on-the-growth-of-social-business?trk=mp-details-rr-rmpost

More proof of the downhill slope for so-called ‘influencer marketing platforms’

I read this news story this morning. This first para explains itself.

“Influencer marketing platform, NeoReach, announces a $1.5M seed round lead by Michael Baum’s Founder.org. The company rewards users for sharing brands and products that they love. Unlike traditional influencer marketing platforms, NeoReach reduces the financial focus by leveraging a targeted matching algorithm and allowing the influencer and blogger to have the final say regarding which products they chose to endorse.”

So, “unlike traditional influencer marketing platforms”, I assume they mean the bubble gum ones that have sprung up over the past year!, this one allows “the influencer and blogger to have the final say regarding which products they chose to endorse.” So what they’re claiming is that with other databases (for that’s what these ‘platforms’ actually are), the influencer and blogger (one and the same person in their world), don’t have the final say in what they endorse!

If a brand pays its money and selects a particular blogger to say something nice about it, then the blogger has to say it!

Could these ‘platform’ companies spiral down-market any faster than they are? And could the true meaning of the word ‘influencer’ get trashed any further?

Reblog: Leveling the Sales Playing Field With Predictive Guidance

Screen Shot 2014-08-21 at 3.53.23 PMA really interesting post at Wired this week. Javier Aldrete talks about the opportunity for predictive guidance when it comes to aiding the performance of salespeople. What struck me were the parallels with market influencers. In talking about ‘tribal knowledge’ he hits on a key differentiator, especially offline, between the top influencers and mere ‘wannabes’.

Move one step further, from predictive guidance to automated mapping, and I think we have the future for real influencer marketing. Not the pointless commercial blogger platforms currently being touted.

The article’s well worth a read.

http://insights.wired.com/profiles/blogs/leveling-the-sales-playing-field-with-predictive-guidance#axzz3B4MOGHpN